Comments for fforw.de

Comment on Gelernter nonsense by regenrinne

regenrinne — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:24:37 +0000

AMEN

Comment on Demo Video Archive by fforw.de » Gelernter nonsense

fforw.de » Gelernter nonsense — Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:23:06 +0000

[...] mag keine Kunst sein, sie ist aber zumindest kreative Leistung und Kunsthandwerk. Einige meiner früheren Arbeiten würde ich aber durchaus als Kunst bezeichnen. Der Künstler der Zukunft ist in einem so hohem [...]

Comment on Playing around with RaphaelJS by Mirko

Mirko — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:34:56 +0000

Marvellous!

Comment on Installing Ubuntu 10.04 by Christopher Jewell

Christopher Jewell — Sun, 30 May 2010 22:41:49 +0000

If I had a dime for every time I came here.. Amazing post!

Comment on The fight with Eclipse by Nickolay

Nickolay — Tue, 25 May 2010 09:28:42 +0000

Thanks for the “Link with editor” solution once more..

Comment on OpenSAGA International by fforw

fforw — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:24:02 +0000

It’s all a work in progress. For now, the website reflects our expectations where our main market will be, given the current status quo and the partners involved with OpenSAGA — and we’re really really short on time.

There have been serious setbacks with incompatible licensing and miscommunication that made the last few days much less relaxing documentation writing than we had initially hoped.

OpenSAGA 1.0 — it’s just the beginning

Comment on OpenSAGA International by Andreas Kuckartz

Andreas Kuckartz — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:57:40 +0000

If OpenSAGA wants to be respected in a global context that should be reflected on its website. The statement “OpenSAGA ist ‘Open Source aus Deutschland’” (which is mentioned as an “advantage” there on several pages) does not help in that context.

Comment on The fight with Eclipse by grv7

grv7 — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:53:31 +0000

Thanks a lot for solution for “Link with Editor” bug. It really helped me.

Comment on JsServ – Serverside Javascript and DOM emulation by fforw

fforw — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:09:32 +0000

@Luxspes

Generally, the idea of having the same language on the server and the client side, a common JS context for both the rhino world and the java server world is highly interesting.

What I am not totally convinced of is extending DOM etc to the server side. While the server side wouldn’t have to deal with the same implementation mess as the client side, there could be a lot confusion and a conceptual bluring of the server/client concept.

That same kind of murky thinking that makes people try to use PHP function in onclick handlers etc.

And before we mimic the client side dynamic and have server-side jQuery, Prototype or Moo to replace a server-side DOM implementation that is regarded as too cumbersome from the beginning, maybe there would be a better way to do server-side content-manipulation etc.

The couchdb app thing I was writing was about such ways.. Basically server-side progressive enhancement by widgets that attached themselves to the HTML doc. But as I said it all became much too complicated to continue side-by-side with the work load of my day job.

Comment on JsServ – Serverside Javascript and DOM emulation by Luxspes

Luxspes — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:47:10 +0000

Hi!
Thanks for answering!
Sad to read that you could not continue with JsSever…
DOM manipulation for javascript-less browsers is interesting but the thing about it that interested me the most, was the idea of being able to write client side and server side logic in the same language (as in Jaxer http://www.jaxer.org/).

The one thing that prevents me form using Jaxer is that I need to have my projects run on Tomcat and connect to the database using JDBC…

Well, I keep dreaming about a Rhino based Jaxer .
Regards,